<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Public Investments, Part III</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michiganfuture.org/10/2009/public-investments-part-iii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michiganfuture.org/10/2009/public-investments-part-iii/</link>
	<description>Creating a Prosperous Michigan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:14:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lou Glazer</title>
		<link>http://www.michiganfuture.org/10/2009/public-investments-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Glazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiganfuture.org/?p=409#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Good suggestion. I&#039;m skeptical of any one idea being a &quot;solution&quot; to our renewed prosperity. But taking advantage of our proximity to Canada – as part of a larger trade/logistics sector – makes a lot of sense to me. Its all part of the larger theme that public investments in areas like transportation infrastructure are an important component on the path back to prosperity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good suggestion. I&#8217;m skeptical of any one idea being a &#8220;solution&#8221; to our renewed prosperity. But taking advantage of our proximity to Canada – as part of a larger trade/logistics sector – makes a lot of sense to me. Its all part of the larger theme that public investments in areas like transportation infrastructure are an important component on the path back to prosperity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Gohl</title>
		<link>http://www.michiganfuture.org/10/2009/public-investments-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>James Gohl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiganfuture.org/?p=409#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Dear Sir,

Anyone wanting to imagine a better economic future for Michigan has only to revisit a map of North America and see what&#039;s sitting on top of the State:ie. Canada. While viewing the map, try imagining pipelines (shipping routes, bridges, rails, flight paths, etc.) funneling into and out of the State.

We are missing the opportunity of becoming the hub of US/Canadian commerce because we are not pursuing an aggressive enough plan to increase pipeline infra-structure that would make this vision possable. Goods and services tend to flow in the direction of least resistance, wouldn&#039;t you agree? But, Michigan till now refuses to see this solution to it&#039;s economic prosperity.

Thank you.
James D Gohl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sir,</p>
<p>Anyone wanting to imagine a better economic future for Michigan has only to revisit a map of North America and see what&#8217;s sitting on top of the State:ie. Canada. While viewing the map, try imagining pipelines (shipping routes, bridges, rails, flight paths, etc.) funneling into and out of the State.</p>
<p>We are missing the opportunity of becoming the hub of US/Canadian commerce because we are not pursuing an aggressive enough plan to increase pipeline infra-structure that would make this vision possable. Goods and services tend to flow in the direction of least resistance, wouldn&#8217;t you agree? But, Michigan till now refuses to see this solution to it&#8217;s economic prosperity.</p>
<p>Thank you.<br />
James D Gohl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

